Specialization in the yucca-yucca moth obligate pollination mutualism: A role for antagonism?

Premise of the study: Specialized brood pollination systems involve both mutualism and antagonism in the overall interaction and have led to diversification in both plants and insects. Although largely known for mutualism, the role of the antagonistic side of the interaction in these systems has been overlooked. Specialization may be driven by plant defenses to feeding by the insect larvae that consume and kill developing plant ovules. The interaction among yuccas and yucca moths is cited as a classic example of the importance of mutualism in specialization and diversification. Pollinators moths are very host specific, but whether this specificity is due to adult pollination ability or larval feeding ability is unclear. Here, I test the potential role of antagonism in driving specialization among yuccas and yucca moths.

Methods: I examined the ability of the most-polyphagous yucca moth pollinator, Tegeticula yuccasella, to pollinate and develop on five Yucca species used across its range. Yucca species endemic to the Great Plains and Texas were transplanted to a common garden in Syracuse, New York and exposed to the local pollinator moth population over 3 years.

Key results: Local moths visited all but one of the Yucca species, but had drastically lower rates of successful larval development on non-natal Yucca species in comparison to the local host species.

Conclusion: Specialization in many brood pollination systems may be strongly influenced by the antagonistic rather than the mutualistic side of the overall interaction, suggesting that antagonistic coevolution is a possible source of diversification.

Keywords: Agavoideae; Asparagaceae; Lepidoptera; Prodoxidae; coevolution; diversification; mutualism; plant defense; specialization; yucca moths.

© 2016 Botanical Society of America.

Similar articles

Hembry DH, Althoff DM. Hembry DH, et al. Am J Bot. 2016 Oct;103(10):1783-1792. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600056. Epub 2016 Oct 7. Am J Bot. 2016. PMID: 27765775 Free PMC article. Review.

McKain MR, McNeal JR, Kellar PR, Eguiarte LE, Pires JC, Leebens-Mack J. McKain MR, et al. Am J Bot. 2016 Oct;103(10):1717-1729. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600198. Epub 2016 Oct 20. Am J Bot. 2016. PMID: 27793858

Rentsch JD, Leebens-Mack J. Rentsch JD, et al. Am J Bot. 2014 Dec;101(12):2062-7. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400351. Epub 2014 Nov 26. Am J Bot. 2014. PMID: 25480703

Althoff DM, Segraves KA. Althoff DM, et al. J Evol Biol. 2022 Jan;35(1):100-108. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13967. Epub 2021 Dec 11. J Evol Biol. 2022. PMID: 34855267

Smith CI, Leebens-Mack JH. Smith CI, et al. Annu Rev Entomol. 2024 Jan 25;69:375-391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-022723-104346. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Annu Rev Entomol. 2024. PMID: 37758220 Review.

Cited by

Zhang B, Sun SF, Luo WL, Li JX, Fang QE, Zhang DG, Hu GX. Zhang B, et al. BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03319-5. BMC Plant Biol. 2021. PMID: 34844558 Free PMC article.

Barve VV, Brenskelle L, Li D, Stucky BJ, Barve NV, Hantak MM, McLean BS, Paluh DJ, Oswald JA, Belitz MW, Folk RA, Guralnick RP. Barve VV, et al. Appl Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 8;8(1):e11315. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11315. eCollection 2020 Jan. Appl Plant Sci. 2020. PMID: 31993257 Free PMC article.

Luo SX, Yao G, Wang Z, Zhang D, Hembry DH. Luo SX, et al. Am Nat. 2017 Apr;189(4):422-435. doi: 10.1086/690623. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Am Nat. 2017. PMID: 28350503 Free PMC article.

Hembry DH, Althoff DM. Hembry DH, et al. Am J Bot. 2016 Oct;103(10):1783-1792. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600056. Epub 2016 Oct 7. Am J Bot. 2016. PMID: 27765775 Free PMC article. Review.